Search for: "Judge Plager"
Results 1 - 20
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2008, 1:43 pm
Recently, CAFC Senior Judge Jay Plager spoke at a symposium at George Mason University, where he called for a "rethinking" of several aspects of patent law by returning to its origins in property law.According to BNA,[Plager] called for a renewed focus on setting recognizable patent ownership boundaries and on strengthening the notice function that patents are intended to serve. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:49 am
Jay Plager and Lynne E. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:07 pm
Jim Pfander (Northwestern) entitled Why Judges Leave the Bench. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
This is especially so when we consider the advantages that judges who regularly see a broad cross-section of patent cases have compared to those who see only an occasional case in the field.Senior Judge Plager also discusses the consequences of the visibility, significance and impact of the court in an earlier article titled "The Price of Popularity: The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:28 am
Since picking the “right” interpretation—claim construction—is a matter of law over which this court rules, and since the view of the trial judge hearing the case is given little weight, so that the trial judge’s view on appeal becomes just a part of the cacophony before this court, it is not until three court of appeals judges randomly selected for that purpose pick the “right” interpretation that the public, not to mention the… [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:29 am
The most interesting opinion of the four is Judge Plager's concurring opinion that focuses on the intentional ambiguity inserted into the claims by 3M. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:32 pm
In a case denying re-hearing in a case involving lodestar calculations, Judge Dyk and Judge Plager both have additional comments. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
Judge Plager suggests that the current statutory criteria for patent validity set forth in the Patent Act eliminates the need for the abstract doctrine. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
Next steps Judge Plager reaches out to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:45 am
Judge S. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
Judge Plager’s words express his own views most directly. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
Judge Plager concludes that the current state of the law does not serve either the patent law nor the public well. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:44 pm
” In fact, I agree with Judge Plager’s dissent in the denial of rehearing en banc in Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
A panel of three federal circuit judges, Judges Newman, Plager, and Wallach, upheld a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences ("Board") in an inter partes reexamination rejecting certain claims of U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 1:38 pm
” In the decision, Judge Plager’s concurring opinion was the most pointed and poignant. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:20 pm
Judge Plager's concurring opinion beginsI join the per curiam opinion of the court, and fullysupport the conclusion stated therein. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:05 am
Since May 2016, Judges Moore, Taranto, Hughes, Chen, Newman, O’Malley, Reyna, Stoll, Wallach and Plager have all sign on to decisions that found at least some software patent claims to be patent eligible. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 7:30 am
Over the last six months the Federal Circuit has provided a great deal of clarity, with 9 judges (Judges Moore, Taranto, Hughes, Chen, Newman, O’Malley, Reyna, Stoll, and Plager) signing on to decisions that found software patent claims to be patent eligible. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
When Tim Lee took on the Federal Circuit in a recent post on TechDirt, it was apparent he had not read Judge Plager's piece in 101 Nw. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:41 pm
Applera (CAFC 2009-1281o) was denied, but Judge Plager, in dissent, had some choice words on the topic. [read post]
